Comments on: The Go Programming Language Promo http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/ Enhance your site with CGi, PHP and ASP scripts Sat, 04 Feb 2012 18:32:35 +0000 hourly 1 By: thezufomec http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/comment-page-1/#comment-1522 thezufomec Sat, 19 Jun 2010 08:06:34 +0000 http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/#comment-1522 c# . . that was created by microsoft who are reputable for their slow, unsecure, inefficient, unreliable and above all buggy, programs . . yes thats right c# is better than Go. fool c# . . that was created by microsoft who are reputable for their slow, unsecure, inefficient, unreliable and above all buggy, programs . . yes thats right c# is better than Go. fool

]]> By: robotguy4 http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/comment-page-1/#comment-1521 robotguy4 Sat, 19 Jun 2010 07:09:14 +0000 http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/#comment-1521 So... No more chair jousting during compile sessions? Isn't progress great? [/sarcasm] So… No more chair jousting during compile sessions?
Isn't progress great? [/sarcasm]

]]> By: ViViDboarder http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/comment-page-1/#comment-1520 ViViDboarder Sat, 19 Jun 2010 06:13:27 +0000 http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/#comment-1520 @robotguy4 Haha! I loved that XKCD but it sucks that my app's compile way too fast! @robotguy4 Haha! I loved that XKCD but it sucks that my app's compile way too fast!

]]> By: Juhi04 http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/comment-page-1/#comment-1519 Juhi04 Sat, 19 Jun 2010 06:01:03 +0000 http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/#comment-1519 Oh great! Another company, another programming language... Can't wait for Go++, Go script, and go basic >.> Anyways, I will surely try it. Oh great! Another company, another programming language… Can't wait for Go++, Go script, and go basic >.>

Anyways, I will surely try it.

]]> By: HaiJet http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/comment-page-1/#comment-1518 HaiJet Sat, 19 Jun 2010 05:14:01 +0000 http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/#comment-1518 Google does some solid stuff. From what i see so far, this looks promising. Curios how it'll end up. Google does some solid stuff. From what i see so far, this looks promising. Curios how it'll end up.

]]> By: MoroJesha http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/comment-page-1/#comment-1517 MoroJesha Sat, 19 Jun 2010 04:19:31 +0000 http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/#comment-1517 No type inheritance, no exceptions, no generics, no method overloading, no Win support. Its said that its main advantage is concurrency but I preffer solutions proposed by Intel or Microsoft(great PLINQ/TPL in C#). Moreover, it uses backend taken from GCC which isn known for creating slow programs. I will stay with ICC, VC++ and C#. No type inheritance, no exceptions, no generics, no method overloading, no Win support. Its said that its main advantage is concurrency but I preffer solutions proposed by Intel or Microsoft(great PLINQ/TPL in C#). Moreover, it uses backend taken from GCC which isn known for creating slow programs. I will stay with ICC, VC++ and C#.

]]> By: MoroJesha http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/comment-page-1/#comment-1516 MoroJesha Sat, 19 Jun 2010 03:52:21 +0000 http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/#comment-1516 @thezufomec Hahah... compare code prouced by VC++ and GCC (Go uses GCC backend). Compare C++0x support in VC++ and in GCC (a lot of nasty bugs). You know nothing about programming... fool. @thezufomec Hahah… compare code prouced by VC++ and GCC (Go uses GCC backend). Compare C++0x support in VC++ and in GCC (a lot of nasty bugs). You know nothing about programming… fool.

]]> By: goreorto http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/comment-page-1/#comment-1515 goreorto Sat, 19 Jun 2010 03:20:13 +0000 http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/#comment-1515 I'm not questioning the language but this feature(i think is cool though)... "When builds are fast, I can get a lot done in a day"? More productive because of fast compilation? Please correct me if I'm wrong here, but if you need to rebuild your whole code every time a modification is made, you're doing it wrong. This doesn't seem to be a useful feature. I'm not questioning the language but this feature(i think is cool though)… "When builds are fast, I can get a lot done in a day"? More productive because of fast compilation? Please correct me if I'm wrong here, but if you need to rebuild your whole code every time a modification is made, you're doing it wrong. This doesn't seem to be a useful feature.

]]> By: thezufomec http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/comment-page-1/#comment-1514 thezufomec Sat, 19 Jun 2010 03:18:38 +0000 http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/#comment-1514 well that's funny, cause the c++0x standard isnt in place yet. Go only uses the GCC backend while they develop their own, and if you knew anything about the GCC backend you'd know its actually an assembler not a compiler, with the c++ parser converting C++ code into assembly code, the fact that this doesn't conform to a standard that doesn't exist yet seems kinda trivial when you apply some thought, what's the point of makin somthing if it's likely to need changing in the near future?? well that's funny, cause the c++0x standard isnt in place yet. Go only uses the GCC backend while they develop their own, and if you knew anything about the GCC backend you'd know its actually an assembler not a compiler, with the c++ parser converting C++ code into assembly code, the fact that this doesn't conform to a standard that doesn't exist yet seems kinda trivial when you apply some thought, what's the point of makin somthing if it's likely to need changing in the near future??

]]> By: MoroJesha http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/comment-page-1/#comment-1513 MoroJesha Sat, 19 Jun 2010 02:26:15 +0000 http://www.cgiphp.com/blog/the-go-programming-language-promo/#comment-1513 You said that MS tools are slow, buggy etc so I gave you a simple comparision VC++ vs. GCC. I know that there is no compiler with full C++0x support, but both VC++10 and GCC 4.5 implement some of its parts so I think that this comparision has sense. Moreover GCC backend is not only a simple assembler. Main optimizations are done at the level of RTL in the backend. Which is only one of internal rerpresentations which are used in GCC. You said that MS tools are slow, buggy etc so I gave you a simple comparision VC++ vs. GCC. I know that there is no compiler with full C++0x support, but both VC++10 and GCC 4.5 implement some of its parts so I think that this comparision has sense. Moreover GCC backend is not only a simple assembler. Main optimizations are done at the level of RTL in the backend. Which is only one of internal rerpresentations which are used in GCC.

]]>